Alphaspirit/stock.adobe.com

Directorship Magazine

The Board’s Strategic Role in Operationalizing Innovation 

By Heather Wishart-Smith

09/14/2026

Directorship Magazine Innovation Member-Only
Key Points
  • Directors should evaluate innovation programs by outcomes—not by the volume of ideas generated, pilots launched, or start-ups funded, which measure effort.
  • Corporate venture capital programs should operate under a clearly defined charter that specifies investment authority, limits, strategic objectives, and the circumstances that require board-level approval.
  • Protecting long-term innovation investment from short-term financial pressure is a board responsibility, not a preference.

This AI-generated summary, based on content on this page, was reviewed by NACD editors for accuracy.

Directors are often shown innovation labs, accelerator programs, and corporate venture capital funds as evidence of innovative momentum. But the board's role is not to evaluate the existence of these programs; it is to ask harder questions about whether those investments are disciplined, aligned with strategy, and built to last.

This piece walks directors through the oversight frameworks that separate productive innovation from innovation theater. It examines what a rigorous internal innovation process requires, what every corporate venture capital charter should define, and how boards can protect long-term innovation investment when short-term financial pressure mounts.

Thank you for your interest in this page.

Member-Only Content

For full access, please log in, or explore membership options.

Heather Wishart Headshot

 

Heather Wishart-Smith, NACD.DC®, is a board director of Orion Energy Systems and Mead & Hunt; Forbes contributor; and advisor on strategy, leadership, and innovation. She is a licensed professional engineer and US Navy veteran.

This article was informative.

No